von eclipse » 28. Aug 2012, 12:01
Ist es zynisch, wenn man im Zusammenhang mit "Ursachen für Erblindung" von "Dunkelziffer" spricht?
(eben gelesen bei wikipedia: Glaukom, 3. Absatz von oben...)
<span style='font-family:Arial'><span style='font-size:10pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:yellow'>Ein kleines Nickerchen am Steuer schützt vorm Älterwerden...!</span></span></span><br><br><span style='font-family:Arial'><span style='font-size:10pt;line-height:100%'><span style='color:red'>Wer sich nicht bewegt, spürt seine Fesseln nicht.</span></span></span><br><br><span style='font-family:Arial'><span style='font-size:7pt;line-height:100%'>"I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing." <br>"But," says Man, "the Babel fish is a dead giveaway isn't it? It could not have evolved by chance. It proves that you exist, and so therefore, by your own arguments, you don't. Q.E.D."<br><br>"Oh dear," says God, "I hadn't thought of that," and promptly vanishes in a puff of logic.<br><br>"Oh, that was easy," says Man, and for an encore goes on to prove that black is white and white is black and gets himself killed on the next zebra crossing.<br>(D. Adams)<br></span></span>